Insights Index
ToggleAI Coding Agents: The Real-World Tools Developers Are Actually Using
AI coding tools are everywhere in 2025. Some suggest code. Others fix bugs. A few can build entire apps. But not all of them are useful for everyone.
In this guide, we’ve ranked the top 20 AI coding agents. We kept it simple. No fluff. Just what each tool does, where it works best, and why it matters.
This isn’t hype. It’s a plain guide for real developers.
Top 20 AI Coding Agents in 2025 – Quick Comparison
Rank | AI Agent | Main Use | Works Best With | Why It Matters |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GitHub Copilot | Code suggestions | VS Code, GitHub | Most widely used |
2 | ChatGPT | General coding help | Web, API | Easy to use, flexible |
3 | Amazon Q Developer | Code + Security | AWS IDEs, VS Code | Great for AWS devs |
4 | Devin AI | Autonomous dev | Web, GitHub | Handles full projects |
5 | Replit AI | App building | Browser | Good for beginners |
6 | JetBrains AI Assistant | Smart autocomplete | JetBrains IDEs | Built into IDEs |
7 | Qodo | Testing + reviews | VS Code, JetBrains | Multi-agent flow |
8 | Sourcegraph Cody | Codebase queries | VS Code, Linear | Understands big codebases |
9 | Jules | Autonomous repo tasks | GitHub, Cloud | Async repo agent |
10 | Tabnine | Simple autocomplete | Most IDEs | Lightweight and fast |
11 | Cursor | Smart edits + chat | VS Code | Works like a live assistant |
12 | Windsurf | AI pair programming | Codeium IDE | Works on complex code |
13 | Vercel AI | Agent SDK + infra | JavaScript, TypeScript | Great for frontend devs |
14 | Lovable AI | Natural language to app | Browser | Non-coders can use it |
15 | AutoGPT | Goal-based tasks | Python CLI | Fully open-source |
16 | Cline AI | Secure open-source agent | VS Code | Privacy-first |
17 | DeepCode AI | Static code analysis | CI/CD pipelines | Focus on security |
18 | Testim | AI test automation | QA workflows | Self-healing test cases |
19 | Copilot Workspace | Infra + SRE automation | Azure, Microsoft Stack | Good for large teams |
20 | Phind | Code search + answers | Browser | Fast results, dev-focused |
1. GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is one of the most used coding agents today. It was built by GitHub and OpenAI. It suggests code in real time, as you type. It works inside editors like VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim.
Copilot can write full functions, complete repetitive lines, and even fix small bugs. It also has a chat panel. You can ask it things like “What does this function do?” or “Fix this loop.”
Where it fits best
- It’s great for writing common code patterns fast.
- It works well with GitHub projects, since it understands repo context.
- If you already use VS Code or GitHub daily, it fits right in.
What to keep in mind
- It can sometimes guess wrong. Always check the output.
- It doesn’t always explain its choices clearly.
- You need a paid plan for full access.
Good for
- Frontend/backend developers
- People who use GitHub every day
- Writing boilerplate fast
Not ideal for
- Large codebase understanding
- Multi-step workflows
- Offline use
Price: Free limited plan, $10/mo Pro, $19/mo Business
Supported IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, Xcode
AI Models Behind It: GPT-4o (default), with options to use Claude or Gemini
2. ChatGPT (OpenAI)
ChatGPT is a general-purpose AI assistant. But many developers use it to write code, fix bugs, and get explanations. It works in a chat interface. You ask a question, it replies with code or guidance.
It’s not tied to any one IDE. You can use it on the web, in apps, or through the API. It supports many languages, from Python and JavaScript to Go and SQL.
Where it fits best
- When you want to understand code, not just write it
- When you’re learning a new language or concept
- When you need quick code snippets, not full projects
What to keep in mind
- It doesn’t remember your files unless you paste them
- You need to check what it writes — it can be wrong
- Big context windows are only available in paid plans
Good for
- Debugging simple errors
- Learning new syntax
- Explaining what a block of code does
Not ideal for
- Full repo analysis
- Multi-file editing
- Live development workflows
Price: Free (GPT-3.5), $20/month (GPT-4o with more tools)
Interface: Web, API, native apps
AI Model: GPT-4o (paid), GPT-3.5 (free)
3. Amazon Q Developer
Amazon Q Developer is the new name for CodeWhisperer. It gives you code suggestions and also checks for security issues. It works well with AWS tools and IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains.
What makes it different is the focus on security. It scans your code as you write and warns you about risky patterns. It can also generate fake data, write unit tests, and fix bugs.
Where it fits best
- Developing inside AWS environments
- Teams that care about secure code
- Writing backend or cloud infrastructure code
What to keep in mind
- You need an AWS Builder ID to use the free plan
- Some features are AWS-specific
- The chat and test features are still evolving
Good for
- Cloud developers
- Security-conscious teams
- Writing infrastructure as code
Not ideal for
- Frontend development
- Non-AWS workflows
- General-purpose chat help
Price: Free individual tier (with AWS login), $19/user/month for Pro
Supported IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains, IntelliJ, Eclipse
AI Model: Custom Amazon model + CodeGuru integration
4. Devin AI
Devin is an autonomous AI developer. It’s not just a helper—it acts like a junior engineer. You give it a task, and it figures out how to complete it step by step. It can plan, code, test, and even deploy projects.
Devin comes with its own shell, browser, and code editor. It uses these tools to write code, search online, run tests, and push updates to GitHub. It can even open pull requests or fix issues from tickets.
Where it fits best
- When you want an agent to do full dev work for you
- For long tasks like writing features or doing refactors
- When you want AI to follow up, retry, and fix things on its own
What to keep in mind
- It still needs supervision. You’ll have to check what it writes.
- Not cheap. Pricing is usage-based and suited for teams.
- It’s powerful, but overkill for small fixes or quick snippets.
Good for
- Full-stack development
- Debugging and testing workflows
- Automating multi-step engineering tasks
Not ideal for
- Quick code snippets
- Simple questions or learning
- Lightweight environments
Price: Pay-as-you-go (from $20 base), Team plan: $500/month, Enterprise custom
Interface: Web-based workspace with shell/editor/browser
AI Model: Internal LLMs + reinforcement learning, agent orchestration
5. Replit AI
Replit AI is part of the Replit online IDE. It helps you build full-stack apps using just natural language. You can type what you want, and it creates the backend, frontend, database, and even deployment setup.
It’s made for beginners and makers. You don’t need to install anything. Just open a browser, start a new project, and talk to the AI. It also explains your code as you go.
Where it fits best
- When you’re building a small web app or prototype
- If you’re not confident with code yet
- For quick one-person projects
What to keep in mind
- Best for web apps, not heavy backend systems
- You’ll still need to guide the AI if things get complex
- Some advanced features require a paid plan
Good for
- Beginner developers
- Hackathon projects
- Solo creators who want to move fast
Not ideal for
- Large-scale production systems
- Enterprise codebases
- Offline workflows
Price: Free tier available, Pro features are usage-based
Interface: Replit IDE (browser-based)
AI Model: Replit’s internal models + OpenAI integration
6. JetBrains AI Assistant
This tool is built right into JetBrains IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, and others. It helps you complete code, refactor functions, explain logic, and write comments or tests—all without switching windows.
Unlike many browser-based tools, this one is designed for deep IDE workflows. It understands your project structure, context, and coding habits as you work.
Where it fits best
- If you already use JetBrains IDEs every day
- For structured, large projects with multiple files
- When you want AI without leaving your local dev environment
What to keep in mind
- Only works in JetBrains products
- Doesn’t have an open chat interface like ChatGPT
- Requires JetBrains account and sometimes plugin updates
Good for
- Java, Kotlin, Python, and TypeScript developers
- Refactoring and improving code readability
- Adding comments and documentation quickly
Not ideal for
- Web-based workflows
- People who use VS Code
- Prompt-heavy agentic flows
Price: Bundled with JetBrains IDEs (some features may need subscription)
Interface: Inside JetBrains IDEs (no browser needed)
AI Model: Based on OpenAI models + JetBrains internal integrations
7. Qodo
Qodo is more than just an autocomplete tool. It’s a multi-agent system that helps you write code, generate tests, review pull requests, and document your project. It works well inside IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains.
You can use it to check your code for issues, create refactor plans, or even explain complex logic. It comes with built-in agents like Qodo Gen (for code), Qodo Merge (for PRs), and Qodo Cover (for test coverage).
Where it fits best
- When your team needs help reviewing and testing code
- If you want AI to help with full repository understanding
- For generating test cases in large projects
What to keep in mind
- Best when used with medium-to-large codebases
- You may need to learn how each Qodo agent works
- Message limits on free tier
Good for
- Backend and full-stack teams
- Code review automation
- Testing coverage and documentation
Not ideal for
- Quick one-file scripts
- Beginners unfamiliar with pull requests
- Non-technical users
Price: Free Developer Tier (250 messages/month), Teams at $30/user/month, Enterprise custom
Supported IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains (via plugins)
AI Models: LLM-agnostic (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Claude supported)
8. Sourcegraph Cody
Cody is a smart coding assistant made by Sourcegraph. It’s built to understand large codebases. You can ask it to explain code, suggest edits, or even apply changes across multiple files. It also shows where its answers come from by citing sources.
It works in IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains. It also connects to tools like Notion, Linear, and Prometheus, which helps if your code is part of a bigger workflow.
Where it fits best
- When you’re working in big repos
- If you need to apply changes across multiple files
- When you want an assistant that explains itself
What to keep in mind
- It needs to index your repo to be fully useful
- Best for teams who use Sourcegraph or similar tools
- Some features locked behind paid plans
Good for
- Codebase navigation
- Multi-file refactoring
- Developers who ask “why” before they code
Not ideal for
- Simple, quick code snippets
- One-off scripts
- Offline or minimal projects
Price: Free tier available, Pro at $9/month, Enterprise at $19–59/user/month
Supported IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Eclipse
AI Models: Supports Claude 4, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Mixtral (user-selectable)
9. Jules (Google)
Jules is an autonomous AI coding agent built by Google. It doesn’t just suggest code. It clones your repo into a secure cloud VM, understands the whole project, and then fixes bugs, writes tests, or upgrades dependencies—on its own.
Jules shows you its plan, reasons for each change, and a diff before doing anything. It also creates pull requests, reviews them, and runs self-tests. You can let it work while you focus on other tasks.
Where it fits best
- When you need repo-wide fixes or upgrades
- For test generation and dependency updates
- When you want AI to handle repetitive dev tasks
What to keep in mind
- Still in public beta (as of 2025)
- Works in cloud, not local IDE
- Setup might feel different from typical AI tools
Good for
- Teams with large codebases
- CI/CD and DevOps-heavy workflows
- Developers who want AI to “take over” certain chores
Not ideal for
- Writing code line by line
- Frontend projects
- Learning environments
Price: Free during beta; pricing TBA
Interface: Cloud-based agent; connects to GitHub
AI Model: Gemini 2.5 Pro
10. Tabnine
Tabnine is a code completion tool. It suggests the next word, line, or block as you type. It works in many languages and supports most popular IDEs. It’s known for being fast, lightweight, and easy to use.
You can use Tabnine with cloud models or keep everything local. That’s helpful if you care about speed or privacy. It’s focused on getting small things right—not on running full workflows or doing repo-wide edits.
Where it fits best
- When you want faster typing
- For writing boilerplate code
- If you need AI but don’t want a heavy setup
What to keep in mind
- It doesn’t explain code or fix bugs
- No chat or autonomous planning
- Not ideal for complex logic or project-wide help
Good for
- Fast coding with autocomplete
- Offline or air-gapped environments (local model option)
- Minimalist workflows
Not ideal for
- Debugging or code review
- Natural language queries
- Multi-file editing or agents
Price: Free basic plan, Pro at $9/user/month
Supported IDEs: VS Code, IntelliJ, WebStorm, Sublime Text, and more
AI Model: Custom Tabnine-trained models (local + cloud)
11. Cursor
Cursor is a modified version of VS Code with built-in AI features. It helps you edit, navigate, and rewrite code using plain language. You can ask questions like “make this async” or “add error handling” and it will apply the changes.
It also comes with an AI chat sidebar. You can chat with it about your codebase. It understands context better than most autocomplete tools because it reads multiple files at once.
Where it fits best
- When you want to edit existing code using plain prompts
- If you prefer a chat-driven coding flow
- When you want AI inside VS Code, not in the browser
What to keep in mind
- You’ll need to switch from your regular VS Code install
- Not fully autonomous—still user-guided
- Requires an internet connection for best results
Good for
- Making quick changes across files
- Learning through code chat
- AI-assisted editing without switching tools
Not ideal for
- Non-VS Code users
- Low-resource devices
- Offline workflows
Price: Free tier available, paid plans based on usage
Interface: Modified version of Visual Studio Code
AI Model: Supports GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini (user-selectable)
12. Windsurf (Codeium)
Windsurf is Codeium’s full-featured AI development environment. It’s built for complex workflows, not just autocomplete. It helps you edit across files, debug code, and run terminal commands—all with help from AI.
It includes features like “Cascade Agent” for multi-file refactoring, “Supercomplete” for smart autocompletion, and a memory system that recalls past interactions. You can also run shell commands through its Command Mode, and the AI knows what’s going on.
Where it fits best
- When you’re managing big, messy projects
- If you want an AI that remembers what you’re doing
- When you want code + terminal + chat all in one
What to keep in mind
- It may feel like too much for small tasks
- Still evolving—some features are being refined
- Better for experienced developers than beginners
Good for
- Full-stack development
- Debugging across files
- Real-time collaboration with AI
Not ideal for
- Simple code generation
- Lightweight, single-file scripts
- People who prefer standalone chat tools
Price: Free access to most features; Pro plan in beta
Interface: Windsurf IDE (desktop client)
AI Model: Powered by Codeium + LLM integrations
13. Vercel AI
Vercel AI isn’t just a code assistant. It’s a toolkit for building full-stack AI-powered web apps and agents. If you’ve used Next.js before, this will feel familiar. It’s made for developers who want to connect AI with real-world interfaces and workflows.
It includes an AI SDK (in TypeScript/JavaScript), lets you build multi-step agents, and deploys projects on Vercel’s serverless platform. You can switch models, trigger actions, and run workflows—all inside your app code.
Where it fits best
- When you’re building an AI-powered web app
- For developers who want full control over models and logic
- For deploying production apps with AI integration
What to keep in mind
- Not meant for beginners or casual users
- You’ll need to know how to work with APIs and SDKs
- It’s more infrastructure than assistant
Good for
- Frontend developers who want to build agent workflows
- Creating chatbots, assistants, or tools with memory
- Deploying full-stack AI apps fast
Not ideal for
- Code suggestion or debugging inside an IDE
- Learning to code
- Low-code or no-code users
Price: Free tier available; Premium plans start at $20/month
Interface: Vercel platform (SDK, CLI, REST API)
AI Model: Vercel’s own “v0-1.0-md” model + integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and others
14. Lovable AI
Lovable is for people who want to build full web apps using plain language. You just describe what you want—like “make a page with a login and payment flow”—and it creates the frontend, backend, and even connects APIs.
It’s made for non-developers, designers, or teams that want to move fast. You can preview changes live, undo anything, and even sync the code with GitHub if you want to take over manually later.
Where it fits best
- When you need to launch a product or idea fast
- For teams that want to collaborate on one platform
- If you want AI to handle the boring parts of setup
What to keep in mind
- It’s not for low-level coding or performance tuning
- You still need to test and polish the results
- Best used with simple to mid-sized apps
Good for
- Non-coders building real apps
- Startup teams and prototypes
- Live collaboration and previews
Not ideal for
- Complex systems or enterprise backends
- Heavy database logic
- Offline or CLI-based development
Price: Free trial; Pro and Team plans available (starts at ~$30/month)
Interface: Browser-based builder with chat agent and live preview
AI Model: Uses OpenAI, Gemini, and Claude combined behind the scenes
15. AutoGPT
AutoGPT is an open-source AI agent framework. It works by taking a high-level goal—like “build a web scraper”—and breaking it down into steps. Then it executes those steps using tools like file access, web search, or code execution.
It’s not tied to any IDE. You run it through a terminal. It chains together LLM prompts to complete tasks with minimal input. It’s a starting point for people building their own AI agents or experiments.
Where it fits best
- For developers exploring autonomous agents
- When you want to automate multi-step dev tasks
- If you like to customize workflows and tool use
What to keep in mind
- Not plug-and-play — you’ll need to set up environment variables, APIs, and configs
- Can hallucinate or fail silently
- Needs debugging and guardrails for production use
Good for
- Experimenting with autonomous LLM agents
- Learning how agents plan, retry, and execute code
- Automating research, scraping, or scripting tasks
Not ideal for
- Beginners with no coding experience
- Fast, accurate code suggestions
- Team workflows or large repos
Price: Free and open-source (MIT License)
Interface: Command-line (Python project)
AI Model: Works with GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude, or custom LLMs via API
16. Cline AI
Cline AI is an open-source AI coding assistant that runs inside VS Code. It’s different from most tools because it has two modes: “Plan Mode” and “Act Mode.” First, it outlines what it wants to do. Then, if you approve, it carries out the coding steps.
It supports multiple LLMs and gives you the option to run locally or connect to private endpoints. That makes it a strong choice for developers who care about control and privacy.
Where it fits best
- When you want to approve code before it’s applied
- For privacy-focused development environments
- If you want to use your own LLM, not someone else’s
What to keep in mind
- Not as polished as commercial tools
- You’ll need to manage setup and API keys manually
- Still a growing project with community-driven support
Good for
- Developers who want control over the AI flow
- Secure environments or internal tooling
- Learning how LLM-based agents “think” before acting
Not ideal for
- Beginners who need plug-and-play solutions
- Non-technical users
- Heavy automation without user input
Price: Free (open-source)
Interface: VS Code extension
AI Model: Model-agnostic: Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.0, or your own endpoint
17. DeepCode AI (Snyk)
DeepCode AI is focused on one thing: finding issues in your code. It doesn’t write new features or build apps. Instead, it scans your code for bugs, bad patterns, and security risks—like a smart, real-time reviewer.
It integrates with IDEs and Git platforms. When you push code, it checks it. When you open a pull request, it flags potential problems. It’s part of the Snyk platform, which focuses on secure coding.
Where it fits best
- Security-first development teams
- Codebases with third-party packages
- CI/CD pipelines with compliance checks
What to keep in mind
- It doesn’t generate or refactor code
- Best used alongside other tools
- Some enterprise features require a paid plan
Good for
- Flagging vulnerabilities and insecure code
- Teams with strict coding standards
- Automated code reviews before merge
Not ideal for
- Writing or scaffolding projects
- Beginners needing coding help
- Offline environments
Price: Free tier with limited scans; Paid plans start at $33/month
Interface: GitHub/GitLab integrations, IDE extensions
AI Model: Proprietary model trained for security, backed by Snyk’s vulnerability database
18. Continue.dev
Continue.dev is an open-source coding assistant that lives inside VS Code. It adds a sidebar where you can talk to an AI about your code. It’s like having ChatGPT in your IDE, but focused on the files you’re actually working on.
You can use it to explain code, write new functions, or edit existing ones. It supports popular open-source models and even lets you plug in your own server. Lightweight, private, and community-driven.
Where it fits best
- If you want local-first AI in your IDE
- When you prefer open tools over commercial ones
- For learning or pair-programming with code context
What to keep in mind
- You’ll need to set up your model (or API key)
- No built-in test/gen/repo features like other agents
- Very dependent on your local setup and compute
Good for
- Code navigation with chat-style help
- Model experimentation inside VS Code
- Privacy-focused or self-hosted environments
Not ideal for
- Repo-wide changes or autonomous edits
- Heavy backend automation
- Non-technical users
Price: Free and open-source (MIT License)
Interface: VS Code sidebar extension
AI Model: Supports any OpenAI-compatible model (Claude, GPT, Mistral, etc.)
19. Codeium
Codeium is a free AI code assistant that focuses on speed and broad language support. It works like autocomplete on steroids—suggesting lines, blocks, and even full functions while you type.
You can also use a chat sidebar to ask questions, refactor code, or get explanations. It supports 70+ languages and integrates with almost every major IDE. Unlike many tools, it’s fully free for individuals.
Where it fits best
- When you need real-time code suggestions
- If you want a free alternative to Copilot
- For multi-language or cross-project coding
What to keep in mind
- No repo-wide or agentic editing
- Chat context may be limited compared to premium tools
- Some features (like Windsurf) require a different install
Good for
- Typing faster across multiple languages
- Developers with small to mid-sized projects
- Those who want free, usable AI in the IDE
Not ideal for
- Large-scale code understanding
- Repo-level changes
- Workflow planning or multi-agent tasks
Price: 100% free for individual use
Interface: Extensions for VS Code, IntelliJ, JetBrains, Jupyter, Vim, and more
AI Model: Proprietary Codeium model
20. Refact.ai
Refact.ai is an AI coding assistant built for local use. It’s made by a team focused on privacy and self-hosting. You can run it entirely on your own hardware without sending any code to external servers.
It works like Copilot, offering suggestions and refactors inside the IDE. But it also supports self-hosted LLMs like StarCoder, Code Llama, or even Mixtral. You choose the model, and it stays in your control.
Where it fits best
- If you want full control over your coding assistant
- When data privacy is critical
- For teams with secure development environments
What to keep in mind
- Setup takes effort—hardware, model weights, configs
- Performance depends on your machine
- Fewer cloud conveniences or built-in integrations
Good for
- Running LLMs on your own GPU or server
- Offline environments (e.g. government, defense)
- Developers experimenting with open-source models
Not ideal for
- Beginners who want plug-and-play solutions
- Lightweight or browser-based workflows
- Teams that rely on SaaS tools and integrations
Price: Free to install; self-hosted (you manage compute)
Interface: VS Code and JetBrains plugins
AI Model: Self-hosted models (StarCoder, LLaMA, Mixtral, etc.)
Beyond the Mainstream: Experimental Dev Agents Worth Watching
Not all AI Agents are built for the spotlight. Some live on GitHub, built by small teams or solo devs. But they’re doing interesting things — combining planning, acting, and tool use in new ways. If you’re exploring what’s next, these are worth keeping an eye on.
- Devika – A self-planning dev agent that reads docs, writes code, and searches the web like a junior dev.
- OpenDevin – The open-source answer to Devin, with repo-wide actions and task memory.
- Bolt – A minimal agent runner for chaining APIs, editing files, and running terminal commands.
- Mocha – A modular CLI-first agent framework for running smart workflows across codebases.
- Rork – A project-based planner that builds apps from goals with step-by-step transparency.
- Clark – A quiet local agent that edits files, runs scripts, and handles coding chores — all offline.
Most of these aren’t polished. But that’s the point. They’re blueprints for the future of coding with agents. Try them if you like building things before they’re mainstream.
21. Devika
Devika is an open-source AI coding agent that mixes the capabilities of ChatGPT, GPT Engineer, and browser agents. You give it a goal, and it breaks it down into subtasks. Then it searches the web, reads docs, writes code, and tests things—all on its own.
It’s still experimental, but it shows what a full-stack agent could be. You can run it locally, and it uses tools like Google Search and browser automation to figure things out.
Where it fits best
- Building AI agents for web + code tasks
- Learning how LLMs can chain tools and logic
- Developers exploring autonomous workflows
Keep in mind
- It’s buggy and in active development
- Setup isn’t beginner-friendly
- Some steps may hang or hallucinate
Price: Free (MIT License)
Interface: Web + terminal + local server
AI Model: GPT-4, OpenRouter, Claude 3 (configurable)
22. OpenDevin
OpenDevin is a serious attempt to build an open-source alternative to Devin (Cognition’s AI software engineer). It uses an agent-based design, memory, browser tools, and terminal execution. You can assign it a repo-level task and watch it plan, act, and revise.
The project is backed by hundreds of contributors and gets frequent updates. You’ll need to run it locally, but once it’s set up, it feels like pairing with a junior developer.
Where it fits best
- Running autonomous dev agents
- Multi-step, multi-file coding tasks
- Debugging and refactoring at scale
Keep in mind
- It’s heavy—requires setup and decent hardware
- Still in early access—expect rough edges
- Not for short scripts or simple edits
Price: Free (Apache 2.0 License)
Interface: Web IDE + Terminal + Agent Dashboard
AI Model: GPT-4o, Claude 3, Mixtral (user-configurable)
23. Bolt
Bolt is a lightweight AI dev agent that takes a task and executes it by chaining together API calls, file edits, and browser actions. Think of it as a thin wrapper around an LLM, with some smart glue and memory on top.
It’s open-source and easy to self-host. It’s not as ambitious as Devin, but it’s useful for running structured, repeatable tasks like testing, refactoring, or fetching data.
Where it fits best
- Self-hosted task runners
- Agents that need basic autonomy
- LLM workflows that run on your infra
Keep in mind
- No built-in IDE or UI
- Requires prompt engineering and task scripting
- More dev tool than assistant
Price: Free and open-source
Interface: CLI + API
AI Model: Uses OpenAI, Claude, or local models
24. Mocha
Mocha is an open-source agent framework for automating dev workflows. It’s built to be modular and lightweight. You can plug in different LLMs, define toolchains, and run tasks like “analyze this repo,” “write tests,” or “summarize this diff.”
It’s more about building your own flow than using a ready-made assistant. That makes it great for DevOps, CICD, or internal tooling.
Where it fits best
- When you want to script agent logic
- Dev teams that already use CLI tools
- Local or private AI pipelines
Keep in mind
- No UI—command line only
- Not beginner-friendly
- Mostly maintained by indie devs
Price: Free
Interface: CLI + JSON task definitions
AI Model: Model-agnostic (OpenAI, Claude, Ollama)
25. Rork
Rork is a project-based AI agent that works like a code planner. You give it a goal (like “build a to-do app”) and it plans steps, creates files, and writes code in context. It’s built on top of GPT-4 and Ollama, and you can run it locally.
The cool part: it shows its reasoning at every step. You can inspect the plan, revise it, or stop it anytime. It’s simple but transparent.
Where it fits best
- Personal agents with clear goals
- Transparent code generation
- Offline-first workflows
Keep in mind
- Still in alpha—may stall on bigger tasks
- Needs good prompts to stay on track
- No advanced memory or feedback loop
Price: Free (open-source)
Interface: CLI + Plan Viewer
AI Model: GPT-4, Mistral, Ollama-supported models
26. Clark
Clark is a local-first AI agent designed for coding, file management, and terminal automation. It lets you type goals like “clean up this folder,” “rename files,” or “add logging to these scripts” — and it builds a plan, then executes it.
Unlike browser-based tools, it stays fully offline and runs fast. It’s meant to be a personal developer agent, not a chatbot.
Where it fits best
- Offline, secure dev environments
- Lightweight project automation
- Local testing, refactors, and file edits
Keep in mind
- No cloud sync or collaboration tools
- Limited model options unless customized
- More powerful with terminal users
Price: Free
Interface: Local CLI + optional browser panel
AI Model: Self-hosted GPT-based models
Conclusion: Choose the Agent That Fits Your Flow
AI coding agents are no longer just autocomplete tools. Some write full apps. Some fix bugs. Others manage tasks, plan actions, or search the web for answers. But none of them are perfect. And none of them replace real developers.
What matters is finding a tool that works with the way you code. If you want fast typing, try Codeium or Copilot.
If you want agents that think through tasks, try OpenDevin or Devika AI. Need privacy? Go with Refact or Clark. Just want a clean IDE chat? Tabnine or Continue.dev gets it done.
And if you’re experimenting? The open tools give you full control. Most of them are free. You can run them locally. You can even build your own.
There’s no one-size-fits-all here. Just tools. Some smart. Some simple. Pick the one that fits your workflow — not the one that shouts the loudest.